Ari Lokesem Naidu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/2306/2020 · 2025-12-29
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56234 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56234 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010037322020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2306/2020 Between:
1. ARI LOKESEM NAIDU,, S/O. A. VENU NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/ O. DOOR NO. 1-90, VENKATARAMAPURAM VILLAGE, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517561, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR-
4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, RAMACHANDRAPURAMU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. RAVILLAVARIPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, RAVILLAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, RAMACHANDRAPURAMU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. 7. VENKATARAMAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, VENKATARAMUPURAM VILLAGE, RAMACHANDRAPURAMU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. 8. K K V PURAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, K.K.V. PURAM VILLAGE, RAMACHANDRAPURAMU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. 9. SORAKAYALAPALEM GRAM PANCHAYAT, SORAKAYALAPALEM VILLAGE, RAMACHANDRAPURAMU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the G.O.Ms. No. 211, Panchayat Raj And Rural Development (E andR) Department, Dt. 31-12- 2019 as it is illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and against the Provisions of the AP Panchayat Rat,Act, 1994, and Rules thereon and also Article 243 of the Constitution of India and G.O.Ms.No. 542 Panchayat Raj And Rural Development (E andR) Department, Dt. 03-12-2007, by setting aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the G.O.Ms. No. 211, Panchayat Raj And Rural Development (E&R) Department, Dt.
31-12-2019, pending disposal of the above writ petition
IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the proposed respondents to as party and necessary respondents 10 to 31 in the above WP No.2306 of 2020 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CH VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M MANOHAR REDDY (SC FOR MUNC AND MUNC CORP )
2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a letter dated 01.12.2025 has been addressed to the Registry and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 30th December, 2025 RKS