Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56233 (KAR)

MR ASHFAQ v. MRS GHOUSIA KHATOON

CMP/29/2023 · 2025-08-12

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E. S. INDIRESH CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 29 OF 2023 BETWEEN SRI ASHFAQ, SON OF LATE M. KHALID, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 332, GROUND FLOOR, DARUL SALAM BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 051. ... PETITIONER/S (By Sri/SMT. : KAMALUDDIN AHMAD, UDAYA PRAKASHMULIYA AND AISWARYA SAJI, ADVOCATES) AND 1 . SMT. GHOUSIA KHATOON, WIFE OF LATE MOHAMMED SHARIEF, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2 . SMT. AYESHA BEGUM, DAUGHTER OF LATE MOHAMMED SHARIEF, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, …2 CMP 29/2023 2 3 . SMT. HAJIRA BEGUM, DAUGHTER OF LATE MOHAMMED SAHRIEF, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4 . SMT. SHAZIA BEGUM, DAUGHTER OF LATE MOHAMMED SHARIEF, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO. 8, 1” FLOOR, PAYAPPA STREET, TASKER TOWN, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 051. 5 . SMT. G RAJALAKSHMI, WIFE OF LATE D. G. GANAPATHI S. A., AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 9/1 B STREET, SIRUR PARK ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU -560 020. 6 . G. SWATHI, DAUGHTER OF LATE D. G. GANAPATHI S.A., AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS , RESIDING AT NO. 9/1 B STREET, SIRUR PARK ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU -560 020. …3 CMP 29/2023 3 7 . SRI SYED SANAULLA, SON OF SYED GAFFAR , AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 101/4 , AMEER JAN STREET, ANEKAL - 562 106. 8 . SRI SYED ISMAIL ABRAR, SON OF MR. SYED AMJAD PASHA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 3, 2ND FLOOR, MOHAMMED GHOUSELANE H. K. P. ROAD, SHIVAJINGAR, BANGALORE - 560 051. ... RESPONDENT/S The advocate for the petitioner has filed the above Civil Misc. Petition Under Sec.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying that this Honble Court may be pleased to (a) Exercise its power under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, and appoint a sole Arbitrator for the resolution of the dispute between the parties, in the ends of justice. (b) Pass such other further orders as deemed under the circumstances of the case. …4 CMP 29/2023 4 This Civil Miscellaneous Petition coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following order. ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Finally, Two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution, without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Vide Court Order dated 12.08.2025, the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : VS C By : GS Ty dt : 30.10.2025 C.dt : 04.11.2025