APHC010107522021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6196/2021 Between: PUSAPATI SUBBA RAJU, S/O.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.NO. 95-25/1, PLOT-17, APSEB COLONY, SEETHAMMADHARA VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY AND DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - HOME, SECRETARIAT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, , NORTH SUB- DIVISION, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.M. PALEM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V CH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th Respondents in illegally interfering with entering into the Petitioner's property admeasuring an extent of Ac.17-46 cents in Sy.Nos.71/1, 71/2, 72/2, 73/1A, 73/2 and 73/6, situated at Paradesipalem Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal and District, by calling the Petitioner repeatedly to the police station and thereby interfering with his peaceful personal life and liberty, without registering the crime against the Petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary and violative 2 of Article 21 of Constitution and further direct the Respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with the Petitioner's personal life and liberty and his activities in the property.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the subject matter pertains to land dispute and is of civil nature and the Petitioner never called the Petitioner to the Police Station nor was threatened by the Police. 3. Sri V.Ch.Naidu, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station and not to interfere in the life and liberty of the Petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.6196 of 2021 Dt.14.10.2025 Dinesh