APHC010733642012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 560/2012 Between: 1. KANDURI VENKATA RANGA RAMANUJACHARYULU (DIED) & 4 OTHERS, - 2. KANDURI GOPALA KRISHNAMACHARYULU, S/O LATE VENKATA RANGA RAMANUJA CHARYULU, R/O HYDERABAD 3. KANDURI VENKATA LAKSHMI NARASIMHACHARYULU, S/O LATE VENKATA RANGA RAMANUJA CHARYULU, OCC:- PUJARI, R/O TELEDEVARAPALLI, VISSANNAPET, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. KANDURI RAJAGOPALA CHARYULU, S/O LATE VENKATA RANGA RAMANUJA CHARYULU, OCC: - PUJARI, R/O AKKIREDDYGUDEM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SMT. TATTA RAMADEVI, W/O NARASIMHACHARYULU, OCC: - PUJARI, R/O MUCHENNAPALLI, NEAR VISSANNAPET, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. A P ENDOWMENTS TRIBUNAL, REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN, HYDERABAD 2. KANDURI VENKATA RAMANUJACHARYULU, S/O LATE VARADACHARYULU R/O C5, PANCHAMURAT SOCIETY, PART 2, BEHIND T.B. HOSPITAL, GOTHI ROAD, BARODA 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, 2 JS,J C.M.A.No.560/2012 VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 1129 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the judgment and decree dt. 30-11-2011 passed by the 1st Respondent in OA No. 2141 of 2010, OA No. 74 of 2001 (of DC-KKD) Pending disposal of the above appeal and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. S SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR APPEALS The Court made the following: 3 JS,J C.M.A.No.560/2012 The Court made the following JUDGMENT: No representation for the appellants. As there was no representation for the appellants on 21.08.2025, the matter was directed to be listed on 11.09.2025. On 11.09.2025 also there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.09.2025 KAS