APHC010526322007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 4284/2007 Between: 1. K. SELVA RAJU, ANANTAPUR DIST., S/O. KOLLAPURI ASSISTANT LINEMAN (TERMINATED FROM SERVICE) R/O. D.NO. 8/89, KURNOOL ROAD, NEAR ZILLA PARISHAD HIGH SCHOOL, GOOTY RAILWAY STATION -515402, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE CHAIRMAN AND M D CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION HYD 3, CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LTD., RED HILLS, HYDERABAD-04 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGERHRD, CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LTD., RED HILLS, HYDERABAD- 04 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATION, CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LTD., ANANTAPUR. 4. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER ENQUIRIES, CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LTD., HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not reinstating the petitioner into service while conducting disciplinary enquiry as per the 2 A.P.S.E.B (Revised) conduct Regulations as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to Regulations, contrary to article 14 of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service as Assistant Lineman immediately with all the consequential benefits in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 5473 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in to service on par with similar nature of cases in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R N HEMENDRANATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL 2. . 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 21.08.2025 and 18.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25.09.2025 MP 4 137 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:4284 of 2007 Date: 25.09.2025 MP