[2025:RJ-JP:4701] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 853/2025 Pradeep @ Golu S/o Giriraj Prasad @ Girraj, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Khandiya Colony, Jhalawar, Police Station Kotwali, Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1676/2025 Virendra Singh @ Golu S/o Bharat Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Khandiya Colony Jhalawar P.s. Kotwali Jhalawar, Dist. Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Radheyshyam Meena S/o Kalulal Meena, R/o 9A Jawahar Colony, Jhalawar Kotwali Jhalawar (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena Mr. Amit Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/02/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.717/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Jhalawar (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 333, 115(2), 126(2), 308(3), 309(4), 119(1) of BNS & Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocity) Act. [2025:RJ-JP:4701] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-853/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that petty dispute has been converted into serious criminal offence. He submits that other co-accused persons of this case have been granted bail by this court vide order dated 11.12.2024. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest. Counsel argues that trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. He submits that petitioner- Pradeep @ Golu is a habitual offender as 21 other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners especially the fact that other co- accused persons of this case have been granted bail by this court; trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1) Pradeep @ Golu S/o Giriraj Prasad @ Girraj & 2) Virendra Singh @ Golu S/o Bharat Singh shall be released on bail provided each of them [2025:RJ-JP:4701] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-853/2025] furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 8. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner-Pradeep @ Golu shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first & third week of every month in the concerned police station. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner-Pradeep @ Golu, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 10. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /42-43