Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 2438 OF 2025 Between: G Mastan Vali, S/o. Khadar Hussain, Aged about 60 years, Occ. self employee, R/o. Siddavatam Road, Gandhi Nagar, Chennampalli Village, Badvel Municipality YSR Kadapa District. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, [. Department, Secretariat, at Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Circle Inspector, Badvel Town police Station, Badvel District. 3. The Station House Officer, Badvel Town police Station Kadapa District. Home YSR Kadapa , Badvel, YSR
4. G Jayaramaiah, S/o. not known . R/o. Siddavatam Road, Sri Krishnadevaraya Nagar, Chennampalli Village YSR Kadapa District. I
5. M Chandra Cement, S/o. not known. ^ ^ R/o. Siddavatam Road, Sri Krishnadevaraya Nagar, Chennampalli Village YSR Kadapa District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High' Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction one more particularly action of the 2nd petitioner by with the dispute in Civil in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the respondent to harass and obstruct the day to day life of the calling the petitioner everyday and interfere
f Litigation insisting upon enter into compromise with the respondentnumbers 4 and 5 regarding to the extent of Ac 3.14 cents in survey numbers 1798 which is situated at Chennampalli village within the limits of Badvel Municipality, YSR Kadapa District, being bad, illegal, arbitrary, contrary to against the principles of natural justice as well as against the constitutional law and consequentially to directing the respondents not to harass the petitioner and his family.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to harass and obstruct the day to day life of the petitioner by calling the petitioner everyday and interfere with the dispute in Civil Litigation insisting upon enter into compromise with the respondent numbers 4 and 5 regarding to the extent of Ac 3.14 cents in survey numbers 1798 which is situated at Chennampalli village within the limits of Badvel Municipality, YSR Kadapa District, pending disposal of main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. V HIMABINDU Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 & The Court made the following: ORDER
f fl APHC010048482025 1 a a IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 2438/2025 Between; ...PETITIONER G Mastan Vali, S/o Khadar Hussain AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State of Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VHIMABINDU Counsel for the Respondent(S);
1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
r f j
ORDER; I f 2 This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India / seeking the following relief: to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2"^ respondent to harass and obstruct the day to day life of the petitioner by calling the petitioner everyday and interfere with the dispute in Civil Litigation insisting upon enter into compromise with the respondent Nos.4 and 5 regarding to the extent of Ac-3.14 cents in survey number 1798 which is situated at Chennampalli village within the limits of Badvel Municipality, YSR Kadapa District, being bad, illegal, arbitrary, contrary to against the principles of natural justice as well as against the constitutional law and consequentially to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner and his family ” \ \ \ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. During hearing, learned Government Pleader for Home furnished a of the instructions of the Station House Officer, Badvel Upgrade Police Station, YSR Kadapa District, dated 30.01.2025, wherein it is stated that respondent Nos.2 and 3 are not the competent authorities to redress the issue of the petitioner’s issue with regard to the civil dispute and, as such, they have not interfered. It is also stated that respondent Nos.2 and 3 have never insisted, harassed and threatened the petitioner to settle the civil dispute with the unofficial respondent Nos.4 and 5. Recording the above instructions, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to interfere with the civil dispute pending
2.
3. copy
4.
3 between the petitioner and respondent Nos.4 and 5, until and unless there is an order from the competent Civil Court. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTI^R //TRUE COPY// To, ( SECTION OFFICER Secretariat, at Velagapudi, police Station, Badvel, YSR Kadapa police Station, Badvel, YSR [OPUC] of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Department Amaravathi, Guntur District. DiSrS'^^'® Inspector, Badvel Town Kadapa‘i?",:?°r"
4. One CC to Smt. V Himabindu, Advocate
5. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court
6. Three CD Copies TF
\ V 1 HIGH COURT DATED:31/01/2025
ORDER WP.No.2438 of 2025 ANDS^ 17 FEB 2025 ^ . Current Section ^ O disposing of the W.P., WITHOUT COSTS