APHC010418342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 22587/2025 Between: 1. BANDI DAYAMANI, W/O NATHANIELU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC- DAILY LABOUR, R/O 2-23, MAIN ROAD, NEAR CHURCH, YAKKALAVARIPALEM, KONDAKAVURU, GURAVAYAPALEM PALNADU (GUNTUR) DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (LA) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARASARAOPETA, PALNADU DISTRICT 5. THE TAHSILDAR, CHILAKALURIPETA MANDAL PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondents to re-determine and pay fair compensation for the Petitioners lands acquired from Kattubadipalem village under the Land Acquisition Act 2013, by awarding 7% as an additional compensation of Rs.40,00,000 (Rupees Forty Lakh) per acre to the Petitioners. This additional amount, when added to the already paid 8.33 lakh per acre, would partially meet the true market value and serve the ends of justice. The Respondents should be mandated to make this payment along with all statutory additions such as solarium and interest as applicable under the law. (for the period of delay in payment), and Pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased Direct the Respondents to consider the Petitioners representation dated 04.08.2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass h Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V.RAVINDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order directing the Respondents to re-determine and pay fair compensation for the Petitioners lands acquired from Kattubadipalem village under the Land Acquisition Act 2013, by awarding 7% as an additional compensation of Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Lakh) per acre to the Petitioners. This additional amount, when added to the already paid 8.33 lakh per acre, would partially meet the true market value and serve the ends of justice. The Respondents should be mandated to make this payment along with all statutory additions such as solarium and interest as applicable under the law. (for the period of delay in payment), and Pass….” 2. Heard M/s. V.Ravindhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. Considering the submissions of both sides, this Court passed the following interim order on 26.9.2025. “Notice before admission. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State is directed to secure instructions. List the matter after four weeks. In the meanwhile, the 2nd respondent-District Collector is hereby directed to examine the representation dated 04.8.2025 submitted by the petitioner meticulously and pass appropriate orders thereon and communicate such decision to the petitioner herein, within a period of three weeks.” 4 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that, in compliance to the above said interim order, the respondents have considered the representation of the petitioner and passed an endorsement on 13.11.2025 and the same is placed on record along with tracking report. According to the said instructions and tracking report, the said order was already communicated to the petitioner. In view of the same nothing survives in the Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner, that, if she has any grievance about the said endorsement, she may assail the same before the appropriate forum. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 08.12.2025 RD 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.22587 of 2025 08.12.2025 RD