1 2025:CGHC:30474 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3408 of 2025 1 - Tulsiram Kaushal S/o Late Gangaram Kaushal Aged About 20 Years R/o Village- Maro (Kanpapara), Tahsil- Nandghat, District- Bemetara (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Ministry Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Bemetara, District- Bemetara (C.G.) 3 - Sub-Divisional OfÏcer (Revenue) Nandghat, District- Bemetara (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar Tahsil- Nandghat, District- Bemetara (C.G.) ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. S.P. Sannat, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Akanksha Verma, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 04/07/2025 1. Counsel for the Petitioner prays for the following relief(s):- (i)That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondent authorities particularly the respondent No. 4/Tahsildar, Tahsil Nandghat to consider and decide the petitioner’s application dated 25.02.2025 for appointment as Kotwar in Gram Panchayat, Maro (Kanpapara), District Bemetara (C.G.) in a time bound manner preferlably within a period of 60 days. (ii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted. 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made application dated 25.02.2025 for appointment as Kotwar in Gram Panchayat Mara (Kanpapara) Tahsil Nandghat, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh but till date the same has not been considered, therefore he prays for a direction to the concerned authorities to decide his representation at the earliest. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to consider the pending claim, she is having no objection to the limited prayer and if the claim of the petitioner is pending, it will be considered in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the respondent-authorities to consider/decide the pending application/representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti