HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1940/2025 1. Rakesh Kumar Jain S/o Shri Mohanlal Jain, Aged About 56 Years, R/o 2, Adarsh Nagar, Malpura, Tonk, Rajasthan 2. Kanalal Sharma S/o Shri Bajrang Lal Sharma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Village And Post Kantoli, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan 3. Ramkishan Sharma S/o Shri Gangaram Sharma, Aged About 53 Years, R/o 167, Adarsh Nagar, Malpura, Tonk Rajasthan 4. Nathu Lal Meena S/o Shri Jagannath Meena, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Malpura, Tonk Rajasthan 5. Sawai Singh S/o Shri Jagdish Singh, R/o Village And Post Jaisinghpura, Tonk Rajasthan 6. Arun Kumar Kabra S/o Late Shri Rameshwar Lal Kabra, Aged About 56 Years, R/o 22, Brajlal Nagar, Malpura, Tonk 7. Seema Jain W/o Shri Vimal Kumar Jain, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Haribhau Upadhaya Nagar, Ajmer 8. Ramawatar Sharma S/o Shri Surajmal Sharma, R/o Ambapura, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk 9. Mahesh Kumar Vijay S/o Shri Ramjus Vijay, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Near Truck Stand, Malpura District Tonk ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur 2. The Director Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner 3. The Director Elementary Education, Rajasthan Bikanr 4. Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Ajmer Range, Ajmer (2 of 3) [CW-1940/2025] 5. District Education Officer Secondary Education, Headquarter Tonk 6. District Education Officer Elementary Education, Headquarter Tonk 7. District Education Officer Secondary Education, Headquarter Ajmer 8. District Education Officer Elementary Education, Headquarter Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. BS Chhaba, AAG with Mr. Avinash Choudhary and Mr. Shubhendu Pilania JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 07/03/2025 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file representation before the respondents- authorities in the light of the order passed by this Court in the case of Jorawar Singh vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (SB Civil Writ Petition No.555/2005). 2. Counsel for the respondents has no objection. 3. The instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 4. In case, any representation is submitted by the petitioners, it is expected from the respondents to decide the same expeditiously, as early as possible, strictly in accordance with law. (3 of 3) [CW-1940/2025] 5. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/179