1 2025:CGHC:61762 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 14014 of 2025 Ramhari Paikra S/o Bandhan Paikra Aged About 41 Years Posted As Technical Assistant/branch Manager State Warehousing Corporation Lormi District Mungeli (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Managing Director State Warehousing Corporation Raipur Sector-24, Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Manager (Personnel) State Warehousing Corporation Raipur Sector-24, Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 4. L.N. Dewangan Posted As Technical Assistant/branch Manager State Warehousing Corporation Tilda (Nevra) District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Diksha Gauraha, Advocate For State : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiyan, Dy. GA For Respondent (s) : Mr. Trivikram Nayak, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 19/12/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present transfer petition assailing the order dated 01.12.2025 issued by respondent No. 3 by which the petitioner has been transferred from State Warehousing Corporation Lormi to State Warehousing Corporation Tilda (Nevra). SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.12.22 11:00:59 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is subjected to frequent transfer by respondents and he was earlier transferred on 27.10.2021 from Lormi to Akaltara-02 as Branch Manager. On 15.11.2022 from Akaltara-02 to Marwahi and finally vide order dated 01.12.2025 from Lormi to Tilda (Nevra). She would further submit that the petitioner has some personal difficulty, as such would pray for quashing of the impugned order. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State vehemently objected the submission made by counsel for the petitioner and would submit that the petitioner remained posted at Lormi about 4 years from 25.09.2018 till 27.10.2021 and now he has been transferred to Tilda (Nevra) which is equal distance from Lormi for attending his father for medical treatment at Bilaspur, thus no difficulty can be arrived at in attending the medical facility of his father and would pray for dismissal of the writ petition. 4. Considering the submission, it is clear that the petitioner is not subjected to frequent transfer but he has shown some personal difficulties which has been considered by the employer, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter S.K. Naushad Rahaman & Other Vs. Union of India & Other 2022(12) SCC 1, keeping in view the personal difficulty faced by the petitioner, therefore, it is directed that the petitioner will make representation before the respondents raising all his personal difficulty which has been considered by the respondents in accordance with the law. 5. With this observation and direction, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Santosh