Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5620 (UTT)

ASHU KUMAR v. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF JAIL PAURI

WPSS/641/2025 · 2025-05-20

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 61 WPSS No.641 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, D.A.G. for the State. The petitioner is Bandi Rakshak in District Pauri Garhwal. He had applied for study leave for pursuing D.El.Ed. programme. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent authorities are not taking any decision on his representation. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had made a representation for availing study leave, but the respondents have yet not taken any action on it; last time, the representation was made on 07.04.2025, Annexure No.6 to the writ petition. Learned State Counsel would submit that the representation dated 07.04.2025, Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition, will be decided by the respondents within a period of four weeks. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned State Counsel. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 4 weeks from today. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 20.05.2025 RV