APHC010652472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 33888/2025 Between: 1. VANAJA KOLA BABY @ DAPPEPALLI VANAJA, W/O LATE JANARDHAN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCCRHOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO. 1/BH21, BHAIRAVA GUTTA, AKKAMPALLI VILLAGE T.SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA (CUDDAPH) DISTRICT 2. DAPPEPALLI CHANDRAMOULI, S/O LATE SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO. 1/BH21, BHAIRAVA GUTTA, AKKAMPALLI VILLAGE T.SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA (CUDDAPH) DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE-DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AT RAYACHOTI ANNAMAYYA (CUDDAPH) DISTRICT 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAJAMPETA DIVISION ANNAMAYYA (CUDDAPH) DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR, T.SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA (CUDDAPH) DISTRICT 5. GUNDLURU NAGENDRA, S/O SUBBAYYA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, AKKAMPALLI VILLAGE T.SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA (CUDDAPH) DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): -2- W.P. No.33888 OF 2025 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of Respondent no.2 to 4 trying to dispossessing the petitioners from the house schedule properties in Plot no. 109 and 110 in Sy.No.12 for an Ext. of Ac. 0.15 cents at Bhairava Gutta, Akkampalli Village T.Sundupalli mandal, Annamayya (Cuddaph) District without following the due process of law and without issuing any notice by the influence of the 5threspondent by highlighting the orders of this Honble Court in WP No.20365/2025 is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of the Art. 14, 21 and 300(A) of Constitution of India and also violation of the principles of natural Justice and Consequently direct the Respondents.no. 2 to 4 not to interfere in the Petitioners house schedule properties without following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto direct the Respondents.no.2 to 4 not to interfere in the Petitioners house schedule properties without following due process of law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VIJAYA KUMAR SOMARAPU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: -3- W.P. No.33888 OF 2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 33888 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The writ petition is filed for the following relief: “…to issue a writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 trying to dispossessing the petitioners from the house schedule properties in Plot no. 109 and 110 in Sy. No.12 for an Ext. of Ac. 0.15 cents at Bhairava Gutta, Akkampalli Village T.Sundupalli mandal, Annamayya (Cuddaph) District without following the due process of law and without issuing any notice by the influence of the 5threspondent by highlighting the orders of this Hon’ble Court in WP No.20365/2025 is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of the Art. 14, 21 and 300(A) Of Constitution of India and also violation of the principles of natural Justice and Consequently direct the Respondents Nos.2 to 4 not to interfere in the Petitioners house schedule properties without following due process of law and pass…..” 2. After arguing the matter for sometime, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt.08.12.2025 BV