IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1035 OF 2025 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to seek expeditious disposal of O.S No. 583 of 2021 on the file of the Court of the First Class Magistrate, Special Mobile Court, Kadapa. Between: 1. Smt. Sapatia Neethamma, W/o. Late Sapatala Mark, aged about 68 years, R/o Door No. 3/1766-16, Scion Puram, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 2. Veparala Philip Kumar, S/o. Late Veparala Abraham, Aged about 59 years, R/o Door No. 6-3-595/50, Gandhi Tata Nagar, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana State. 3. Veparala Bharathi, D/o. Late Veparala Abraham, Aged about 54 years R/o Door No. 3/1591, Seionu Puram, Kadap City, YSR Kadapa District. ...Petitioner/Plaintiffs AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its District Collector, Kadapa. 2. The Tahsildar, Mandal Revenue Officer, Kadapa Mandal. 3. The Mandal Revenue Inspector, Mandal Revenue Officer, Kadapa Mandal. ...Respondents/Defendants % Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VINOD KUMAR PEMMASANI «• .f , V Cojunsei for the Respondents: -- if Sr- The Court made the following ORDER: o.% APHC010203712025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1035/2025 Between: Smt Sapatia Neethamma and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.VINOD KUMAR PEMMASANI Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1035/2025 ORDER 1. This civil revision petition is filed questioning the inaction on the part of the Judicial First Class Magistrate for Special Mobile Court. Kadapa in not disposing of the suit in O.S.No.583 of 2021, which is filed for issuance of family member certificate in favour of plaintiffs/petitioners. 2. It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioners 1 and 3 are the sisters and the petitioner No.2 is the brother of one Veparala Baby Kala Rani, who was unmarried and died on 30.11.2018, due to Cancer, while working as Superintendent at Hon’ble Family Court, Kadapa. The petitioners and their mother Saramma and another sister by name Santhamma performed her last rites and performed all her death ceremonies at their house in Kadapa. While so, on 07.12.2018 their mother Saramma applied family member certificate of the said Veparala Baby Kala Rani, for and on behalf of petitioners and Santhamma being one of legal heirs of deceased to the 2^^ respondent along with the copies of required documents, then the defendant authorities rejected the same stating that documents were not submitted, though at the time of submitting application, they have enclosed all the said required documents and the same had been verified by the 3'^^ defendant at the time of his visit. While things stood thus, the mother of petitioners/ plaintiffs i.e., Saramma and another sister of petitioners/plain tiffs i.e., Santhamma died on 24.04.2021 due to old age. Thus, the petitioners/plaintiffs became the legal heirs of Veparala Baby Kala Rani and brought the same to the notice of the defendants/ respondents 2 and 3 and requested them to verify all the documents and issue family member certificate of their sister Veparala Baby Kala Rani in their names being her legal heirs and enable them to claim her death benefits and other employment benefits etc., as she died in service, but the defendants did not consider their representation. Hence, they instituted a suit in O.S.No.583 of 2021 before the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa. Though the suit was numbered on 16.06.2021, till this date, the same was not disposed of. Hence, this petition. 3. Heard both sides. 4. Right to expeditious trial is a right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and failure to dispose of the suit causing much delay at the cost of the parties would amount to denial of speedy trial. Therefore, the Judicial First Class Magistrate for Special Mobile Court, Kadapa, is directed to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.583 of 2021, in accordance with law, within nine (09) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. In the result, civil revision petition is disposed of. No costs. 6. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECfl^^FFICER To, 1. The First Class Magistrate, Special Mobile Court, Kadapa. 2. One CC to Sri Vinod Kumar Pemmasani, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies Chp sree HIGH COURT DATED: 24/04/2025 ORDER CRP.No.1035 of 2025 5 13 MAY 2125 o /5' DISPOSING OF THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION WITHOUT COSTS