THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. CHAJJU SINGH S/O BHAIRU SINGH
CRLBC/18/2024 · 2025-01-23
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5619 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5619 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3283] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Cancellation Application No. 18/2024 The State Of Rajasthan, through the Public Prosecutor ----Petitioner Versus
1. Chajju Singh S/o Bhairu Singh, Aged 46 Years
2. Magan Singh S/o Bhairu Singh, Aged 51 Years
3. Ranveer Singh S/o Magan Singh, Aged 23 Years All residents of Patakpur, Police Station Laxmangarh District Alwar At Present Police Station Bahatukala District Alwar. Accused/Respondents
4. Jaiveer Singh S/o Raghuraj Singh, R/o Patakpur, Police Station Bahatu Kala District Alwar. ----Complainant/Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, P.P. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 23/01/2025 The present bail cancellation application under Section 439 (2) Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused-respondents by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Laxmangarh, District Alwar (for brevity “the learned Additional Sessions Judge”) vide order dated 09.11.2023 passed in Bail Application No.278/2023 CIS No.235/2023 in connection with FIR No.0132/2021 registered at Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 447, 302 & 307 IPC and later on for the
[2025:RJ-JP:3283] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-18/2024] offence(s) under Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 447, 325, 302 & 307 IPC. In pursuant to the direction of this Court dated 08.08.2024, learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the status report dated nill furnished by the Station House Officer, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar which reflects that the prosecution evidence is over and the case is fixed for recording the accused plea. It does not reflect any averment that the accused- respondents have misused the liberty of bail extended to them by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated
09.11.2023. In view thereof, no case for cancellation of bail granted to the respondents vide order dated 09.11.2023 is made out at the fag end of trial. This application seeking cancellation of bail is dismissed accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/8