APHC010363502020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24184/2020 Between: 1. R.KOTESWARARAO, S/O. ANJAIAH, D.NO.2-112, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, KADAVAKUDURU VILLAGE, CHINAGANJAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 2. A.POLERAMMA, S/O. BRAHMAIAH, D.NO. 2-121, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, KADAVAKUDURU VILLAGE, CHINAGANJAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 3. A.SARASWATHI, W/O. SAMBAIAH, D.NO. 3/2/1, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, KADAVAKUDURU VILLAGE, CHINAGANJAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 4. A.SIVAMMA, W/O. YEDUKONDALU, KADAVAKUDURU VILLAGE, CHINAGANJAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHINAGANJAM P.S., PRAKASAM DISTRICT 2. THE TAHSILDAR, MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, CHINAGANJAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the 1st Respondent and its subordinates in interfering with petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners property without any notice or due process of law in respect of the land to an extent of admeasuring Ac.4-30 cents in Sy. Nos. 115, 115/Part of Motupalli village, Chinaganjam Mandal, Prakasam District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law.” 2. Sri Thota Rama Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, let there be a direction to the Police not to interfere in the possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners over the subject property. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners over the subject property. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the Petitioners’ peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.24184 of 2020 Dt.14.10.2025 Dinesh