Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010620862017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1272/2017 Between:
1. BYLAPUDI SEKHAR, VISAKHAPATNAM.,, S/O.RAMU, AGED 27 YEARS,
R/O.D.NO.18-117/1, VELAMPETA, PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND
1. SMT BYLAPUDI DIVYA VISAKAPATNAM 2 OTRS REP PP, W/O.BYLAPUDI SEKHAR, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O.PLOT NO.231, 2ND FLOOR, OPP : POSTAL STAFF QUARTERS, SECTOR - 2, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. BABY BYLAPUDI VINOOTNA, D/O.BYLAPUDI SEKHAR, R/O.PLOT NO.231, 2ND FLOOR, OPP : POSTAL STAFF QUARTERS, SECTOR - 2, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. (2N.D RESPONDENT BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN / 1ST RESPONDENT SMT.BYLAPUDI DIVYA). 3. THE STATE OF A P, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order of the court of the Judge, Family Court, cum- V Addl. District & Sessions Judge at Visakhapatnam in M.P.No.181 of 2015 in O.P.No.434 of 2015, dt.08.11.2016,
2
and to pass such other and further order or orders as deemed fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 2062 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 71 days in filing this appeal against the order of there occurred such delay in filing this appeal against the order of the Judge Family Court-cum-V Addl. District and Sessions Judge, at Visakhapatnam in MP.No. 181/2015 in OP.No. 434/2015 dated 8-11-2016. IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 2063 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order of the Judge, Family Court-cum- V Addl. District & Sessions Judge at Visakhapatnam in M.P.No.181 of 2015 in O.P.No.434 of 2015, dt.08.11.2016, during the pendency of this appeal in the interest of justice and to pass such other and further order or orders as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SRI K. SANDEEP, ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. The Court made the following:
O R D E R
1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the Order dated 08.11.2016 passed in M.P.No.181 of 2015 in O.P.No.434 of 2015 on the file of learned Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge at Visakhapatnam (for short, ‘the trial Court’). 2. Heard and perused the record. 3
3. As seen from the record, this Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order dated 08.11.2016 passed in M.P.No.181 of 2015 in O.P.No.434 of 2015. The M.P.No.181 of 2015 has been filed by the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein seeking to grant interim maintenance of Rs.15,000/- per month. By impugned order dated 08.11.2016, the trial Court partly allowed the petition. Against the said order, the petitioner herein preferred the revision. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the main O.P.No.434 of 2015 was dismissed on 28.08.2019. In support of this, a copy from the e-Courts website has been filed, which reflects that the said O.P.No.434 of 2015 was dismissed on 28.08.2019. 5. Recording the said submission of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and in view of the disposal of the O.P.No.434 of 2015 on 28.08.2019, this Court finds the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date: 05.11.2025 MS
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1272 of 2017 Date: 05.11.2025
MS