APHC010238422019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10612 OF 2019 Between: 1. THOTAKURA TRINATH,, S/O SIVA RAMAKRISHNAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, BUSSINESS, R/O D.NO.15- 66, WHISPER MEADOWS APARTMENT FLAT NO-502, PRABHU NAGAR, PORANKI,PENAMALURU MANDAL KRISHNA DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF POLICE, TASK FORCE DEPARTMENT, CM CAMPUS ROAD, BUCKINGHAMPET, VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH 520004 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TASK FORCE, VIJAYAWADA. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TASK FORCE, VIJAYAWADA. 5. ANUMOLU VENKATA LAKSHMI, AGED 38 W/O SRIDHAR, PORANKI, SRINIVASNAGAR, DEDEPIYA HEIGHTS, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 6. ANUMOLU SRIDHAR, S/O PRAKASH RAO, AGED 45 PORANKI, SRINIVASNAGAR, DEDEPIYA HEIGHTS, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 7. CHENNUPATI VENKATA KOTESWAR RAO, SIC) SAMBA SIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, PORANKI, NEAR ELRAHMAM TEMPLE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10612 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in interfering with maters which are civil in nature as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to not summon the petitioner to police station and to pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing learned Counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 04.11.2025 TJN 3 12 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10612 OF 2019 Date: 04.11.2025 TJN 4 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 10612 OF 2019 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 02. 04.11.2025 BVLNC,J The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. (vide separate order) ________ BVLNC,J TJN