Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56166 (AP)

A R INFRA DEVELOPERS v. S. SURESH KUMAR, IAS

CC/1886/2025 · 2025-11-20

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010360812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1886/2025 Between: 1. A R INFRA DEVELOPERS, 7-158B, MANGALAGIRI MIDDLE CENTER, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR, BHIMAVARAPU KRISHNA PRIYA, W/O KOTI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. R/O 7-70, KAZA VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. DR P SAMPATH KUMAR IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER. COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, PRIME HILL CREST, 4TH FLOOR, NEAR DGP OFFICE, BESIDE ULTRATECH READYMIX PLANT, VADDESWARAM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH PINCODE 522502 4. SHAIK ALEEM BASHA, COMMISSIONER OF MANGALAGIRI 2 TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFFICE MANGALAGIRI MAIN ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH, 522503. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for wilful disobedience of order of this Honhle Court passed in WP.No. 12503 of 2024, dt. 22-07- 2024 passed by and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the order under contempt has already been complied with. 2. In view of the same, this contempt case is closed, as no cause survives. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 21.11.2025 NNN