- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25801 WP No. 18435 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 18435 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. G.C. VISHWANATH S/O LATE CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT DODDAGARUDANAHALLI VILLAGE BASARALU HOBLI MANDYA TALUK & DISTRICT-571 416. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VACHAN G.A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHANNEGOWDA S/O LATE NATHEGOWDA AGED MAJOR, 2. CHALUVEGOWDA S/O LATE NATHEGOWDA AGED MAJOR, 3. CHIKKACHANNEGOWDA S/O LATE NATHEGOWDA AGED MAJOR, 4. G.C. RUDRESH S/O LATE CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25801 WP No. 18435 of 2025 5. KALAYANAMMA W/O PUTTASWAMY D/O LATE CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 5 ARE ALL R/OF DODDAGARUDANAHALLI VILLAGE BASARALU HOBLI MANDYA TALUK & DISTRICT-571 416. 6. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA-571 401. 7. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA-571 401. 8. THE TAHSILDAR MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA-571 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, AGA FOR R.6 TO R.8) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT IN R.P.NO.378/2024 DATED 15/11/2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-'E', ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25801 WP No. 18435 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing order dated 15.11.2024 in R.P.No.378/2024 and order dated 09.08.2024 in R.Miss.No.218/2019 at Annexures-E and D respectively, inter alia sought for direction to Tahsildar to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records. 3. Having taken note of the finding recorded by respondent Nos.6 and 7, the mutation has been made pursuant to the registered sale deeds by the respondent-authorities. It is also contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there are two sale deeds with respect to which, petitioner and the private respondents herein are claiming right over the land in question. 4. In that view of the matter, taking into consideration the reasons assigned by the respondent-authorities, the matter is of the civil in nature, wherein parties have to establish their rights before the Civil Court and therefore, I am of the view - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25801 WP No. 18435 of 2025 that, there is no interference called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34