- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25921 WP No. 23939 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 23939 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PUSHPALATHA B.M. WIFE OF LATE B T MALLIKARJUN AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 2. SRI B M RAHUL S/O LATE B T MALLIKARJUN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 3. NAKUL B M S/O LATE B T MALLIKARJUN AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT SUBBAREDDY BUILDING 1ST FLOOR, 6TH CROSS JCR LAYOUT CHITRADURGA TOWN-570005. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SANGAMESH R.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU-560001. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25921 WP No. 23939 of 2022 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAVANAGERE DISTRICT DAVANAGERE-577001. 3. THE TAHSILDAR DAVANAGERE DISTRICT DAVANAGERE-577001. 4. RAVIKUMAR H C S/O H H CHANDRASHEKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NITUVALLI COLLEGE ROAD KASABA HOBLI DAVANAGERE TALUK-577004. 5. M V RAVI S/O M V VEERABHADRAPPA AGED 48 YEARS D.NO.851/6 BAKKESHWARA 9TH CROSS, TARALUBALU BADAVANE DAVANAGERE-577005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. KALEEMULLAH SHARIFF, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. B. M. ARUN, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TAHSILDAR TO REMOVE THE NAME OF THE RESPONDENTS NO.3 AND 4 FROM THE REVENUE ENTRIES IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SURVEY NO.34/2A, MEASURING 20 GUNTAS OF NITUVALLI VILLAGE, DAVANGERE; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONTINUE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS IN VIEW OF DEATH OF THEIR FATHER LATE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25921 WP No. 23939 of 2022 B T MALLIKARJUN IN THE SAID LAND BEARING SURVEY NO.34/2A MEASURING 20 GUNTAS OF NITUVALLI VILLAGE, DAVANGERE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In W.P.No.5968/2025, petitioners herein have assailed the order passed by the respondent - authorities quashing the MR entry made in favour of private respondents herein. 3. In that view of the matter, the relief sought for in W.P.No.23939/2022 does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the W.P.No.23939/2022 is hereby dismissed. 4. Consequently, I.A.1/2024 does not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60