Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56151 (KAR)

SRI. VENKATESH K. v. M/S SRI KANNIKA PARAMESHWARI CO OPERATIVE BANK

CCC/755/2023 · 2025-08-21

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32907-DB CCC No. 755 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 755 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SRI. VENKATESH K., S/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, M/S. MARUTHI ENTERPRISES, HAVING THEIR BUSINESS CONCERN AT: No.2777, NEAR A.P.M.C., N.H.13, CHENNAGIRI - 577 213, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. SANJAY B.K., ADVOCATE -(ABSENT)) AND: 1. M/S SRI. KANNIKA PARAMESHWARI CO-OPERATIVE BANK HAVING THEIR REGISTERED OFFICE AT: No.165/1-2, 2ND MAIN, P.J. EXTENSION DAVANAGERE - 577 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI. SANDESH 2. ANNAPPA M. SUB-REGISTRAR CHANNAGIRI, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT- 577 213 Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32907-DB CCC No. 755 of 2023 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY …ACCUSED (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI, AGA FOR R2 & R3) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971, PRAYS TO (a) TO PASS AN ORDER BY THIS COURT TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFULLY, KNOWINGLY AND DELIBERATELY DISOBEYING THE ORDERS OF THE HON'BLE COURT DATED 23.06.2023 IN W.P.No.12657/2023 (GM-RES) AS PER ANNEXURE-B. THIS CCC, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) Despite granting sufficient opportunity to comply with the office objection, the same has not been complied with. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32907-DB CCC No. 755 of 2023 2. Today, the matter is listed for compliance of office objection for the third time. There is no representation for the complainant, even for the second call. 3. Hence, the contempt of court case is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RAK List No.: 3 Sl No.: 11