1 2025:CGHC:61122 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6534 of 2025 1 - Raipur Dharam Pradeshiya Samaj A Society Registered Under Chhattisgarh Society Registration Act 1973, Having Its Registration No. 4180 Dated 01-03-1975 Having Its Office At Khistbandhu Nivas Bairan Bazar Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) Though Its Secretary Joseph Moolakkara S/o Chacko Moolakkara Aged About 73 Years, R/o Bairan Bazar Church, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Department Of Revenue And Disaster Manangement, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (R) Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Tehsildar Tehsil Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Additional Tehsildar Tehsil Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Akshay Lodha S/o Madan Lal Lodha Aged About 37 Years R/o House No. D-11, Sector-4, Devendra Nagar Raipur, Tehsil Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Through His Father Madan Lal Lodha S/o Chandanmal Lodha, R/o House No. D-11, Sector-4, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Tehsil Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 7 - Shyam Chawla S/o P.R. Chawla R/o Sadani Nagar Boriyakala, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 8 - Vishwadini Pandey R/o Anant Vihar Colony Mowa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) (Other Details Of This Respondent Are Not Available In The Entire Records Of The Case) --- Respondent(s) BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.12.17 10:51:01 +0530 2 ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Kishore Narayan, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1 to 5 : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 16.12.2025. 1. On objection being raised by counsel for State that the Tahsildar is proceeding in the case in accordance with law which is duly reflecting from the order sheet and if for any reason petitioner is having grievance that under Chhattisgarh Lok Sewa Guarantee, 2011 the proceedings is not completed within a period prescribed, then he can file proceedings before the appellate authority as prescribed therein, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail other alternate remedy available to him under the law. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram