Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5614 (JHR)

SUNIL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.Rev./99/2022 · 2025-09-08

Sanjay Prasad

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:27133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No.99 of 2022 …. Sunil Kumar, age about 44 years, son of Late Girja Nandan Prasad Singh, resident of Qr. No.-B-788, Sector-II, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnathpur, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand ……Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Amitabh Sahay, son of not known to the petitioner, resident of Saffire Residency, Pragati Path, Bahu Bazar, P.S.-Lower Bazar, P.O.-G.P.O., Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand ……Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kr. Soni, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, A.P.P …… Order No.08/08th September 2025 In the light of judgment passed in the case of Yogendra Pratap Singh Vs. Savitri Pandey and Anr. passed in Criminal Appeal No.605 of 2012 by the Hon’ble the Supreme Court of India. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Criminal Revision No.99 of 2022 with liberty to file fresh complaint case as the present complaint case was premature. 2. Learned APP has no raised objection. 3. In view of this submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in the light of the judgment passed in Criminal Appeal No.605 of 2012 by the Hon’ble the Supreme court of India, the learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this Criminal Revision Application with the liberty to file fresh complaint case subject to the limitation which shall be considered by the learned Court below. 4. Thus, this Criminal Revision No.99 of 2022 is permitted to be withdrawn with the observation mentioned above. (Sanjay Prasad, J.) Nishant/-