1 2025:CGHC:42321 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9811 of 2025 1 - Chandresh Kumar Tilgam (Wrongly Mentioned As Chandesh Kumar Tilgam In Transfer Order Date 30.06.25) S/o Shri Lomas Singh Tilgam Aged About 43 Years Working As Rural Agriculture Extension Officer (Raeo), In The Office Of Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Block Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Agriculture Development And Farmer Welfare And Bio Technology, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Agriculture Directorate Of Agriculture, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Joint Director Agriculture (Jda) Bastar Division, Distt. Bastar At Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Deputy Director Agriculture (Dda), Distt. Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Senior Agriculture Development Officer Block Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Collector Distt. Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.08.22 12:19:40 +0530 2 Hon ’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 21/08/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition on the grievance that though the transfer order has been issued on 30.06.2025, the petitioner is not being relieved. 2. The issue regarding implementation of transfer order has been considered by this Court in the case of Ms. Manisha Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others, 2015(4) C.G.L.J.182, wherein relying upon several judgments of the Supreme Court it has been held by this Court that once the employee has been transferred it is required to be complied with unless it is modified, varied or cancelled. Therefore, in these circumstances, either the transfer order has to be implemented or the State has the option to cancel, vary or modify or keep in abeyance. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that if the transfer order of the petitioner is still operative, the respondent authorities shall relieve the petitioner towards implementation of the transfer order. 4. It is also made clear that if any administrative exigency impede the petitioners' relieving, the petitioner shall be informed in writing. It will also remain open for the respondents to reconsider the issue of transfer on account of any administrative exigency. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika