Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56114 (AP)

PALLELA NAGESHWARA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/26918/2023 · 2025-11-23

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010517792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26918/2023 Between: 1. PALLELA NAGESHWARA RAO, S/O MANIKYAM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O D.NO.6-19-10/2, DASARI BAIRAGIVARI STREET, TUNI TOWN, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TUNI TOWN POLICE STATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TUNI POLICE STATION, KAKIN ADA DISTRICT. 5. GOPALDAS LAKSHMI, W/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-22-25, CHIDARNVARI STREET, MARKANDRAJUPETA, TUNI TOWN, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....to issue a writ, order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3 rd and 4th respondents in not registering the crime lodged by the petitioner through complaint dated 2.8.2023 against the 5th respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequent direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to register the crime against the 5th respondent, pursuant to the complaint dated 2.8.2023 and to take action against the ,5th respondent in accordance with law.” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in the Writ Petition. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 24.11.2025 ASR THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26918 of 2023 Dt.24.11.2025 ASR