Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56113 (CHH)

LOMAN SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8609/2023 · 2025-12-01

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8609 of 2023 1 - Loman Singh S/o Ganesh Ram Aged About 32 Years Warking As Radiographer (Daily Wages Emplopee) At Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar Memorial Hospital Raipur (C.G.) Permanent R/o Village Amachani, Post Bhothidih, Tahsil And P.S. Magarlod, Civil And Revenue And District Dhamtari (C.G.) 2 - Gajadhar Prasad Sahu S/o Pardeshi Ram Sahu Aged About 34 Years Working As Radiographer (Daily Wages Emplopee) At Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar Memorial Hospital Raipur (C.G.) Permanent R/o Village Chhadiya, Post Pallari, P.S. Tahsil Pallari, Civil And Revenue And District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Civil And Revenue District, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Additional/upper Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Civil And Revenue District, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Director (Health Services) Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Civil And Revenue, District Raipur (C.G.) VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 4 - The Divisional Joint Director Health Service, Bilaspur, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- None For State :- Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, G.A. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 02.12.2025 1. Heard. 2. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even when the matter is called out in second round, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha