Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56107 (KAR)

H S MURALIDHARA v. PAVANASHETTY @ PAVAN

MFA/5728/2021 · 2025-04-26

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H T NARENDRA PRASAD & SRI. H PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY, MEMBER M.F.A.NO. 5728/2021 (MV) (LOK ADALAT NO.3964/2025) BETWEEN: H S MURALIDHARA S/O H S SHESHAGIRI RAO AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS PUROHIT R/AT GANESHA NILAYA RAJANAIDU ROAD, OLD TOWN BHADRAVATHI 577201. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI JAGAN MOHAN M T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . PAVANASHETTY @ PAVAN S/O CHANDRASHEKHARA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT GARUDADRI ILAVENTER JUDICIAL LAY-OUT KANAKAPURA ROAD, BANGALOE 560078. 2 2 . VIKASA THOLAR S/O KARUNAKARA THOLAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS ANALIST, R/AT B-1, 1001 S.N.N.RAJ SERANITY ELENAHALLY VILLAGE BEGUR ROAD, BANGALORE 560068. 3 . DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE BHARTIAXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. BELLARY ROAD HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560024. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:17.06.2017 IN MVC NO.976/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, ADDITIONAL MACT-11, BHADRAVATHI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to 3 sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent- Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent- Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs. 1,20,000/- (Rupees One Lakh and Twenty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The enhanced compensation amount of Rs.1,20,000/- is ordered to be released in favour of the appellant – claimant, on proper identification. 4 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER CM/-