Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27759 CRL.P No. 1277 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1277 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
TABREEZ @ RAHAMATHULLA SHARIFF S/O MOHAMMED YOUSUFF, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
2.
SUMAIAH BEGUM @ SUMAIAH BANU W/O RAHAMATHULLA SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
PETITIONER 1 & 2 BOTH ARE R/AT NO 61, 1ST CROSS SHAMPUR ROAD, MUNESHWARA NAGAR, ARABIC COLLEGE BANGALORE-560045. KARNATAKA.
3.
SHABINA @ SHABEENA W/O SYED ZAKIR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT 48, 3RD MAIN, NEW BEGUR LAYOUT, LINGARAJPURAM, BANGALORE-560084.
4.
ROSHINI @ ROUSHNI C/O JAMALUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT 02, 8TH MAIN, 1ST STAGE,
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27759 CRL.P No. 1277 of 2023
2ND BLOCK, HBR LAYOUT, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE-560084. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AFROZ PASHA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
SMT. AFREEN NAZ W/O SYED ASIF, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 47/2, GROUND FLOOR, ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET MARAPPA GARDEN JC NAGAR, BANGALORE-560046. …RESPONDENT (NIL)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CRL.MISC.NO.33/2022 FILED UNDER SEC.12 R/W 18,19,20 AND 22 OF THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT 2005, PENDING ON THE FILE OF IV METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE TRAFFIC COURT AT BENGALURU REGISTERED BY THE PETITIONER / RESPONDENT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner.
2. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session.
3. This matter is of the year 2023.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27759 CRL.P No. 1277 of 2023
4. Vide order dated 07.07.2025, ten days time was granted to do the needful, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition.
5. Despite the same, needful is not done. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE
RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11