Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56104 (AP)

Pothula Vikram, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/27077/2022 · 2025-11-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010441782022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27077/2022 Between: 1. POTHULA VIKRAM,, S/O. KALYAN, AGED 36 YEARS, OCCU- BUSINESS, PLOT G1,DOOR NO.33-160/1 R/O- PLOT G1,DOOR NO.33-160/1 6TH LANE, DEVI NAGAR, NEAR CANANOSSA SCHOOL, PAYAKARAOPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM,ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,SECRETERRIATE, AMARAVATI, ANDHRAPRADESH. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ,NARSARAOPET II-TOWN POLICE STATION,NARSARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARSARAOPET,GUNTUR DISTRICT,ANDHRAPRADDESH. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT,ANDHRAPRADDESH 5. POTHULA LAKSHMI JYOTHI MATTAM LAKSHMI JYOTHI, W/O. VIKRAM, AGE 37 YEARS,OCCU- BUSINESS,R/O- BARAMPETA, NARASARAOPETA,GUNTUR DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHARAT CHANDRA A Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. I.M.S PRAKASH The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ order or direction particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction and delay of the Respondent No.2 in filing Charge Sheet in F.I.R No.16/2022, dated 02-02-2022, 2 before the Narsaraopeta II - Town Police Station is unjust and unconstitutional and violative of Article 19,21 of the constitution of India and direct the Respondents No.2 to file the charge sheet as early as possible in the Crime No. 16/2022, dated 02-02-2022, before the Narasaraopet II-Town Police Station and direct the Respondent to follow the due process of law.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 07.11.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27077 of 2022 Dt..07.11.2025 ASR