Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 561 (UTT)

VIPIN KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/628/2025 · 2026-06-17

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.628 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Pankaj Semwal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy A.G. along with Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned counsel for the complainant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the controversy raised between the parties have amicabley been settled by them, therefore, nothing survives in the present writ petition and the same has become infructuous. 5. Learned counsel for complainant does not dispute the aforesaid submissions. 6. Accordingly, the criminal writ petition is dismissed as infrctuous. 7. Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated. 8. Pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mahra, J.) 17.06.2026 Mamta MAMTA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f244f3e584af1449e430e f900bf09a6d67ebbd642671329b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1d9cabfd54852c9e68911 ca8b66dd26690a191648ab5d8dd004ef0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.06.18 17:27:08 +05'30'