- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25912 WP No. 34053 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 34053 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RUDRA HANUMAIAH S/O LATE RUDRAPPA @ DODARUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, 2. SRI THOPAIAH S/O LATE RUDRAPPA @ DODARUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 3. SRI NAGAPPA R S/O LATE RUDRAPPA @ DODARUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT BANJARA VILLAGE, THATHAGUNI POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. KAVITHA D.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT OFFICE, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD BENGALURU-560009 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25912 WP No. 34053 of 2024 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB DIVISION KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD BENGALURU-560009 3. SPECIAL TAHSILDHAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD BENGALURU-560009 4. SRI B T KRISHNA S/O LATE THIMMAIAH BANJARA VILLAGE, THATHAGUNI POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT 560 060. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.06.2020 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN R.A.(S). NO.41/2018-19 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.B AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25912 WP No. 34053 of 2024 2. In this writ petition, petitioners are assailing the order dated 15.06.2020 (Annexure 'A') passed by respondent No.2 and the order dated 05.08.2024 (Annexure 'B') passed by respondent No.1. 3. Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful examination of the finding recorded by both the authorities it would indicate that, the respondent No.4 herein has purchased the schedule land from one Hanumakka as per the registered sale deed and it is also forthcoming that there is a decree in OS No.1871/2007 in favour of respondent No.4 herein, wherein the declaration has been made in so far as the 36 guntas of land bearing Sy.No.100/3A. In that view of the matter, as the MR No.49/2013 -14 has been made pursuant to the judgment and decree in OS No.1871/2007 as per the registered sale deed referred to above, I am of the view that there is no perversity in the impugned orders passed by the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25912 WP No. 34053 of 2024 respondent Nos.1 and 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE YKL/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27