ABHISHEK KUMAR ALIAS SONU v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/17570/2025 · 2025-05-29
Krishan Pahal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56096 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56096 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93283 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17570 of 2025 Applicant :- Abhishek Kumar Alias Sonu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shailesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Shailesh Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. Learned State Law Officer has informed that the notice to the informant has been served on 12.05.2025.
4. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.117 of 2025, under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) B.N.S. and 4/2 POCSO Act, 2012, Police Station Maharajganj, District Azamgarh, during the pendency of trial.
5. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have enticed away the minor daughter of the informant on 07.04.2025.
6. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The FIR is delayed by about one day and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. The victim is a consenting party as is but evident from her statement recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S. She is 15 years old, although by her looks she seems to be major.
7. Learned counsel for the applicant has further argued that there is no medical corroboration of the incident. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 09.04.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
8. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application.
9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the delay in institution of FIR and there being no medical corroboration of the incident, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
10. Let the applicant- Abhishek Kumar Alias Sonu, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed.
11. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
12. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses.
Order Date :- 30.5.2025 (Ravi Kant) (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad