APHC010154412021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8793/2021 Between: 1. PANTHAMKRUPAKARA RAO, S/O RANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, CULTIVATION, D.NO.3-353, BALAJI NAGAR, ANNAVARAPPADU, PERAVALI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 534330. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI-534001. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOVVURU, KOVVURU (M), WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT., 534350. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PERAVALI MANDAL, PERAVALIMANDAL, TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 5. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, ANNAVARAPPADU VILLAGE, PERAVALI (M), WEST GODAVRI DISTRICT- 534330. 6. MUTYALA RENUKA, W/O LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, D NO 1-226, CHERUVU GATTU VEEDHI, ANNAVARAPPADU, WEST GODAVARI. DIST., PIN - 534330 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.8793 of 2021 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction, declaring the action of Respondent No.1 and 5 arbitrary in dealing with the schedule property pertaining to which a suit for Partition is pending is illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction and violation of Principles of Natural justice and also violation of Article 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to not to dispossess the Petitioner from THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY in R.S.No.206/3 in Annavarppadu Village, W.G. District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to order STAY of all or any Proceedings by the Respondents including the transfer of title, conversion of the nature of land etc., pertaining to the schedule property and direct the Respondents to not to dispossess the Petitioner from THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY pending disposal of the main writ and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SREE DEVI KANTETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra 3. D V SASIDHAR 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.8793 of 2021 The Court made the following Order: No representation for the petitioner, inspite of posting the matter under the caption “for dismissal”. 2. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 19.08.2025, 02.09.2025, 16.09.2025 and 11.11.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. 3. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 18.11.2025 PGT