1 2025:CGHC:53964 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 644 of 2024 Shankardayal Sonwari S/o Munuram Sonwani Aged About 48 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village- Sendri, Police Station- Nagarda, Tahsil Sakti, District- Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1 - Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal S/oramadhar Jaiswal Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Putekela, Police Station- Nagarda, Tahsil- Sakti, District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh. 2 - Suresh Kumar Jaiswal S/o Ramadhar Jaiswal Aged About 37 Years R/o Village- Putekela, Police Station- Nagarda, Tahsil- Sakti, District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh. 3 - Naresh Kumar Jaiswal S/o Ramadhar Jaiswal Aged About 35 Years R/o Village- Putekela, Police Station- Nagarda, Tahsil- Sakti, District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh. 4 - Ganeshram Jaiswal S/o Ramadhar Jaiswal Aged About 33 Years R/o Village- Putekela, Police Station- Nagarda, Tahsil- Sakti, District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. KK Pandey, Advocate For Respondents No.1 to 4 : Mr. Ram Vifal Ram Rajwade, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 04/11/2025 1. This appeal has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 374(4) of the Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 19.09.2018 passed in unregistered complaint case/2018 by the learned Special Judge SHUBHAM SINGH RAGHUVANSHI Digitally signed by SHUBHAM SINGH RAGHUVANSHI Date: 2025.11.06 16:34:08 +0530 2 (Atrocities), District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 2. The case of the appellant is that on 11.10.2017 at about 8 PM, the appellant along with Surendra Kumar @ Guddu Jaiswal, Ramshankar Shriwas and Bhola Jaiswal were sitting in the house of appellant, at that time, the accused/ respondents entered into the house of appellant and abused him with filthy and derogative languages and humiliate him in the name of his caste and demanded Rs. 1,00,000/- failing which, they will kill him. The appellant made complaint before the Adim Jati Kalyan Thana, Janjgir, but no offence was registered against the accused/ respondents, then the appellant made complaint before the Superintendent of Police, Janjgir-Champa, despite this, no action was taken on the complaint of the appellant, therefore the appellant filed a complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. 3. The learned Special Court, after examining the inquiry report from AJAK Police Station, concluded that a civil dispute exists between the parties. The police enquire the complainant's report dated 12.07.2017, revealed no criminal offence, leading to no further action. Consequently, the learned Special Court, vide impugned order dated 19.09.2018, rejected the complaint for lack of sufficient grounds. 4. Upon perusal of the impugned order, this Court finds no illegality or error in the order of learned Special Judge. 5. Accordingly, the appeal being devoid of merits is hereby dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Shubham