APHC010527772021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 214/2022 Between: BOLA RAJESH, S/O. SRINIVASULU, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC SOCIAL SERVICE, R/O.15/115, BESTHA COLONY, CHENNURU, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHENNURU POLICE STATION, CHENNURU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not registering a Crime against the named individuals therein pursuant to complaint dt.01.12.2021 of the Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to register a Crime against the named individuals pursuant to complaint dt.01.12.2021 of the Petitioner forthwith.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint of one 2 Pothuraju Pullamma, a case in Crime No.201 of 2021 on the file of Chennur Police Station for the offence under Section 509 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of SCs & STs (PoA) Amendment Act, 2015 has been registered against the Petitioner herein. Police after completion of investigation filed charge sheet which is numbered as Spl.S.C.No.2 of 2022 on the file of SCST Court-cum-IV Additional District Judge, Kadapa and the same is pending trial. It is further submitted that the Petitioner herein filed a false complaint to counter the cased registered against him. 3. Sri Kurra Srinivasulu, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:13.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.214 of 2022 Dt.13.11.2025 Dinesh