SREE LAKSHMI NAGAR WELFARE ASSOCITTION v. LAKSHMI LASER MARIA
CMP/15512/2025 · 2025-08-11
Anita Sumanth, N Senthilkumar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56083 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56083 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CMP.No.15512 of 2025 and W.A.SR.No.71580 of 2025 Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J. and N.SENTHILKUMAR,J. (Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J.) Service
is
complete. Ms.Thillainayagi, learned counsel who undertakes to file vakalat for R1 would submit that R1 has no objection to the condonation of delay of 63 days in filing the
Writ
Appeal.
Likewise, Mr.A.Selvendran,
learned
Special Government Pleader appearing for R2 and R3 as well.
2. Hence, and also for the reasons set out in paragraphs 11 and 12 of the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 63 days in filing the Writ Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.
3. Registry is directed to number the Writ Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission.
4. The name of Ms.Thillainayagi, learned counsel for R1, will, by consent expressed by her, continue in the cause list as and when the Writ Appeal is listed for hearing. [A.S.M.,J] [N.S.,J] sl 11.08.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis