IMTIYAZ HUSAIN ZARGAR v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/943/2013 · 2025-03-03
Sindhu Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5608 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5608 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 39
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 943/2013
Imtiyaz Hussain Zargar
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None
V/s
State and others …..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Vivek Mattoo, Advocate vice Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy. AG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER 03.03.2025
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last three consecutive dates of hearing i.e. on 03.07.2015, 09.05.2014 and
25.04.2014. Today also, same is the position. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the present petition. Dismissed in default of appearance and for non-prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE
Jammu: 03.03.2025 Vishal Khajuria