Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56075 (AP)

Manubolu Bhaskar, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/27380/2025 · 2025-10-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010515082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27380/2025 Between: 1. MANUBOLU BHASKAR,, S/O. CHINA MASTHANAIAH, RESIDENT OF CHEMBADIPALEM VILLAGE, VINDUR MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH-524406. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (HOME), A.P. SECRETARIAT, NELAPADU, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, AT TIRUPATHI 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUDUR RURAL CIRCLE, GUDUR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUDUR RURAL POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 5. Y SHOBHA RANI, W/O. E. VENKATA KRISHNAIAH, BALAJI NAGAR, GUDUR TOWN, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 6. Y AVINASH, , S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH, BALAJI NAGAR, GUDUR TOWN, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KALAGATLA KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declare the action of the Respondent No. 4 in summoning the petitioner to the Police Station orally without there being any crime registered in Gudur Rural Police Station, Tirupati District, to settle the civil dispute in between the petitioner and the Respondent No. 5 and 6, as 2 illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the procedure established under law, consequently direct the Respondent No. 4 herein not to harass the petitioner by exerting police pressure to settle the civil dispute.” 2. Heard Sri K.Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondents. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:08.10.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27380 of 2025 Dt.08.10.2025 Asr