Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 56073 (BOM)
SANJAY S/O PURUSHOTTAM TOKEKAR v. STATE OF MAH. THR. PI, SAKKARDHARA PS, NAGPUR AND OTHERS
WP/827/2023 · 2025-10-07
Shri Anil L Pansare, Shri Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56073 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56073 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 cr. wp 827.2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 827 OF 2023 [Sanjay S/o Purushottam Tokekar vs. State of Maharashtra, through P.I., Sakkardhara P. S., Nagpur and ors.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------ - - - Ms. Upasana S. Shahu, Advocate h/f Mr. S. M. Bahirwar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. I. J. Damle, APP for the State/respondent nos. 1 and 2 Mr. D. R. Galande, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 and 4 Mr. R. R. Rajkarne, Advocate for respondent no. 6 CORAM: ANIL L. PANSARE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE,
JJ.
DATED : 07-10-2025. The petitioner has approached this Court with grievance that the respondents have not taken cognizance of his complaint dated 1-8-2023.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that cognizance has been taken and First Information Report has been lodged on 19-12-2023 vide Crime No. 583/2023. Thus, the purpose of filing petition is served. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (A. L. PANSARE, J.) wasnik 2025:BHC-NAG:10380-DB