Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5607 (CAL)

anjali biswas @ bishwasi @ bishwas v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/886/2023 · 2025-02-20

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sl.No. 3 Court No. 35 G.S.Das 20.02.2025 WPA 886 of 2023 Anjali Biswas @ Bishwasi @ Bishwas -Vs- State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Shibaji Kr. Das Mr. Dipendu Sarkar Ms. Deblina De … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Ansar Mandal, ld. AGP Ms. Prativa Ghatak … for the State – respondent(s) The contentions advanced by the petitioner have been found to be correct by the Officer-in-charge of Pandua Police Station. Report submitted by the police authorities reflects that Pandua P.S. Case No. 636 of 2023 dated 22.11.2023 was registered for investigation under the relevant Sections of the IPC and consequently charge-sheet was submitted. This Court on 5.12.2024 directed the police authorities to file a fresh a report over the issue of the petitioner being harassed and subjected to immense torture. Pursuant to which an enquiry was conducted by a lady police officer in the rank of Sub-Inspector of Police which revealed that there is a dispute over a property and the private respondents are involved in threatening and using abusive languages. A report, to that extent, has been prepared by the concerned officer. In view of the petitioner’s contention being fortified by an enquiry conducted by a police officer as also the fact that already a criminal case is pending before the learned jurisdictional Court being Pandua P.S. Case No. 636 of 2023, I direct that, in case, bail has been granted to the private respondents, the learned Magistrate on an application by the complainant will modify the order of bail after hearing the private respondents to the extent that if there has been any violation of the condition of bail being granted they should stay outside the jurisdiction of Pandua police station. If such application is filed at the instance of the present petitioner, the learned Magistrate in seisin of the aforesaid case would dispose of the same within a period of a fortnight from the date of filing of such application after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the necessary parties. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 886 of 2023 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Report so submitted be kept with the record. A copy of the report be handed over to the petitioner. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)