APHC010547202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NOS: 28673 & 28676 OF 2025 WRIT PETITION NO: 28673 OF 2025 Between: 1. KANTAMNENI RAMBABU,, S/O. KUTUMBARAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, AGRICULTURAL COOLIE, R/O D.NO. 3-1 AKUNURU VILLAGE, VUYYURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VUYYURU DIVISION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, VUYYURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, AKUNURU VILLAGE, VUYYURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. NARVNENI CHANDRASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 2. GP FOR REVENUE WRIT PETITION NO: 28676 OF 2025 Between: 1. YANDURU VENU GOPALA RAO, S/O. KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 3-14, AKUNURU VILLAGE, VUYYURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. YANDURU JAGAN MOHANA RAO,, S/O. KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 3-14 A, AKUNURU VILLAGE, VUYYURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VUYYURU DIVISION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, VUYYURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, AKUNURU VILLAGE, VUYYURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NARVNENI CHANDRASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 3 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORAL COMMON ORDER: Heard Sri B. Parameswara Rao, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri N. Chandrasekhar, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Sri Abdul Rasheed, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings and Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for Revenue. 2. Sri Abdul Rasheed, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader has submitted the Written Instructions dated 13.11.2025 (in both the Writ Petitions) furnished by the Executive Engineer, (R&B) Division, Machilipatnam. Copies of it are supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same are taken on record. 3. The relevant portion of the Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer, (R&B) Division, Machilipatnam is usefully extracted hereunder: “I herewith submit that there is no R&B Road near the premises of the petitioner. Further, there is no proposal under the purview of the R&B Department for widening of the road mentioned by the Petitioner and no action was initiated by the R&B department for eviction of the Petitioner's house. Therefore, the subject have no relation with R&B department. Therefore, it is requested to exempt Respondent 1, i.e., State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, roads and Buildings department from the subject Writ Petition. This is submitted for favour of information.” 4. Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for Revenue has submitted the Written Instructions dated 15.10.2025 (in both the Writ Petitions) furnished by the Tahsildar, Vuyyuru. Copies of it are supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and the same are taken on record. 4 5. The Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer as extracted above, would clearly indicate that there is no R & B Road in the subject area. Similarly, the Written Instructions of Tahsildar would also indicate that the office of the Tahsildar has not received any information from the R & B Division and therefore, no precipitative action is proposed against the Writ Petitioners herein. 6. Having so recorded, these two Writ Petitions are disposed of. No order as to costs. 7. Needless to state that the Official Respondents shall follow the due process of law if any coercive measures are sought to be initiated against the Writ Petitioners. 8. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 01.12.2025 Mnr 5 79 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos.28673 & 28676 OF 2025 Dt: 01.12.2025 Mnr