IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10656 OF 2025 Between: Sri Tadikonda Phani,, S/o Sambasiva Rao, Aged 44 years, R/o 4-123, Near Cinema Hall, Mandadm, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh - 522503. ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Department, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Guntur, Amaravathi. The Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority (APCRDA), Represented by its Commissioner, Vijayawada, GUNTUR District, Andhra Pradesh. The District Collector, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. The Special Deputy Collector, Unit No. 16, Malkapuram, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District. Sri Suddepalli Jareesh Babu, S/o Suddepalli Poul, aged 45 years, R/o Uddandarayunipalem, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or Order, Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of Respondent No.4, in not considering the petitioner representation dated 01.04.2025 as illegal, arbitrary and a violation of principles of natural Justice under 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Articles 14,19,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently f^'tltre^t the respondent authorities not to register the Plots situated at andarayunipalem, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh vide ;Nos.17-616-2085-7-H5, 11-506-4158-32-A1, 11-506-4158- 33-A1 and 1-506-4158-87-C2 in favour of R5 or third parties. JA No: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4 representation, dated 01.04.2025. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKAT CHALASANI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FO MUNICIPAL ADMN & URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 4: SMT.S. PRANATHI, SC FOR APCRDA Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: The Court made the following: ORDER y' Vi i. ■B--- #!■ tti respondent to consider the petitioner APHC010214202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 05B [3331] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10656/2025 Between: 1.SRI TADIKONDA PHANI, S/0 SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED 44 YEARS, R/0 4-123, NEAR CINEMA HALL, MANDADM, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522503. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR, AMARAVATHI. 2.THE ANDHRA PRADESH CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APCRDA, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4.THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, UNIT NO. 16, MALKAPURAM THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5.SRI SUDDEPALLI JAREESH BABU, S/0 SUDDEPALLI POUL, AGED 45 YEARS, R/0 UDDANDARAYUNIPALEM, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): m SRS.J W.P,No.10656 of 2025 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or Order, Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of Respondent No.4, in not considering my representation dated 01.04.2025 as illegal, arbitrary and a violation of principles of natural Justice under Articles 14,19,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to register the Plots situated at Uddandarayunipalem, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh vide Plot Nos. 17-616-2085-7-H5, 11-506- 4158-32-A1, 11-506-4158- 33-A1 and 11-506-4158-87-C2 in favour of R5 or third parties and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to consider my representation, dated 01.04.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VENKATCHALASANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.4 in not considering the representation dated 01.04.2025, made by the petitioner, illegal and arbitrary. Heard Sri Chalasani Venkat, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.S. Pranathi, learned Standing Counsel, appeared for respondents 2 & 4. 2. ™age 3 of 4 SRSJ W,P No 10656 of 2025 Notice of respondent No.3 is dispensed with since no adverse orders are passed affecting the right and interest of respondent No.3. Learned counset for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner purchased an extent of Ac.0.76 cents in Sy.No.90/4 and Ac.0.17 cents in Sy.No.102/4 from respondent No.5, under an agreement dated 06.03.2019. Respondents 2 & 4 developed the lands and allotted plot Nos.7, 32, 33 & 87 to respondent No.5. Respondent No.5 is making efforts to get the lands registered in his name. The petitioner made a representation dated 01.04.2025. However, the same has not been considered. 3. Smt. Pranathi, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 2 & 4 would submit that the respondent authorities will considerthe representation made by the petitioner strictly as per the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority Act 2014 and Rules made thereunder. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of both the learned counsel, directing the respondent No.4 to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 01.04.2025 and pass appropriate orders as per the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority Act 2014 and Rules made there under, if necessary, by issuing notice to respondent No.5. No order as to costs. 4. 5. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMlViA assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER SE To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Department, Pradesh Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, amaravati, , Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority (APCRDA), Vijayawada, GUNTUR District, Andhra Pradesh. State of Andhra Guntur. 2. The Commissioner The District Collector, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. The Special Deputy Collector, Unit No. 16, Malkapuram, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District. Sri Suddepalli Jareesh Babu, S/o Suddepalli Poul, aged 45 years, R/o Uddandarayunipalem, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. One CC to Sri Venkat Chalasani,. Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Municipal Admn & Urban Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] One CC to Smt. S.Pranathi, SC for APCRDA. [OPUC] Three CD Copies. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. gi gi HIGH COURT DATED:24/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10656 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS