HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36300 of 2022 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Today when the matter is taken up, it is informed by Sri Jamal Ahmad Khan, learned counsel for the respondent that the present petition has now become infructuous. 2. This arguments has not been rebutted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. When the aforesaid order has been passed, the file has not been sent by the Office and the Registry informed that he will trace out the file and place before the Court as soon as possible. 5. Since the file has been traced out and sent by the office before the Court on 06.10.2025, the aforesaid order has been transcribed, signed and uploaded on 07.10.2025. July 28, 2025 saqlain Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharmendra Dhar Dubey, Sarveshwar Lal Srivastava, U.S. Singh Visen Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jamal Ahmad Khan, Satish Chandra Kulshrestha (Prakash Padia,J.) Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Regional Manager Aligarh .....Petitioner(s) Vinod Kumar And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad