Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56041 (PNJ)

RAVINDER SINGH VIRK v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/25887/2025 · 2025-05-13

Sandeep Moudgil

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25887-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 13.05.2025 RAVINDER SINGH VIRK .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate and Mr. Jaspreet Singh Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG Punjab. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) CRM-19606-2025 Application is allowed, as prayed for. Exemption from filing of certified copies of Annexures P-1 to P-6 and for placing on record the mor legible copies of photocopies of vernaculars Annexure P-1, P-2 and P-5, are granted. CRM-M-25887-2025 The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for issuance of an appropriate Order or Direction quashing the impugned F.I.R. No.0150 dated 7.9.2016 registered under 306, 34 I.P.C. 1860 at Police Station Mehatpur, District Jalandhar (Annexure P-1) Rural with a further prayer for issuance of an appropriate Order or Direction MEENU 2025.05.13 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-25887-2025 -2- quashing the impugned order Annexure P-5 dated 2.2.2021 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nakodar in case UCR/21/2018, CNR No.PBLA10018972018 titled ‘State Vs. Narinderjit' arising out of case F.I.R. Annexure P- 1 dated 7.9.2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner would confine his prayer to the effect that the trial Court is not passing any order on the cancellation report, which is presented by the State on 06.06.2018 and the protest petition preferred by the complainant is also pending since then. The aforesaid fact qua the filing of cancellation report dated 28.11.2016 (Annexure P-2) is not denied by the State counsel. In the light of above, this Court would deem it appropriate to direct the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Nokodar to pass an appropriate order on the cancellation report expeditiously preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petition stands disposed off, accordingly. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 13.05.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MEENU 2025.05.13 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document