APHC010032602017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11722/2017 Between: 1. SRR PRIVATE ITI,, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT SYED ABDUL REHAMAN,S/O. SYED ABDUL GAFFOR SAHEB, OPP. SRILANKA COLONY, PODALAKURU ROAD, KOTHURU, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH-524 004. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING DGT, MINISTRY OF SKILL DEVELOPMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP SHRAM SHAKTI BHAVAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI-110001. 2. NATIONAL ACCREDITATION BOARD FOR EDUCATION AND TRAINING, (NABET) ITP1 BUILDING, 6TH FLOOR, 4-A, RING ROAD, IP ESTATE, NEW DELHI 110002. 3. QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIA QCI, 2ND FLOOR, INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS BUILDING, 2- BHADURSHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI - 110002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the Application No. APP 005296 dated $-4-2015 submitted by the petitioner for affiliation, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon' ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 14584 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the Application No. 2 APP 005296 dated 8-4-2015 submitted by the petitioner for affiliation, pending final disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATA RANGADAS KANURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P SARADA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Smt. P. Lakshmi Priyanvita, learned counsel representing Sri Venkata Rangadas Kanuri, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 8th October, 2025 cbn 4 212 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.11722 of 2017 8th October, 2025 cbn