251 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-2991-2025 Date of Decision: 06.04.2026 MANJINDER JOHAL AND OTHERS ….Appellant(s) VERSUS SURINDER KAUR AND OTHERS ….Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. Pratap Singh Gill, Advocate with Ms. Amrit Kaur, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Saroj Kumari, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) for respondent No.1. Mr. Shiva Khurmi, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** ANOOP CHITKARA , J. (Oral) 1. Appellant has come up before this Court by filing the present LeƩers Patent Appeal for seƫng aside the order dated 24.07.2025 passed by ld. Single Bench in CWP-15348- 2021, whereby prayer of respondent No.1 was allowed. 2. Counsel for the appellants submits that senior ciƟzen transferred property by way of Will in their favour and because of this reason they sought permission to avail legal remedy before the Civil Court, however, the Single Bench declined the same. Now for that limited purpose the appellant has come up before this Court. 3. We have heard counsel for the parƟes. The ends of jusƟce would suffice if the order is read with the following modificaƟon. “The liberty is granted to appellant to avail legal remedy before Civil Court. This liberty shall be subject to law of limitaƟon and res judicata” 4. With the aforesaid modificaƟon, the present appeal stands disposed of. Pending applicaƟon(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) April 06, 2026 JUDGE Sangeeta Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANGEETA 2026.04.22 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document