Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5602 (KAR)

SMT. BUSHRA W/O MUKHTAR MUJAWAR v. KITTUR RANI CHANNAMMA URBAN SOUHARD

CRL.RP/100223/2022 · 2025-04-24

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6786 CRL.RP No. 100223 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100223 OF 2022 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SMT. BUSHRA W/O. MUKHTAR MUJAWAR, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. 2ND CROSS, SUBHASH NAGAR, BELAGAVI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI, PIN CODE-590016. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. B. DEYANNAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND: KITTUR RANI CHANNAMMA URBAN SOUHARD SAHAKARI LTD., MAHANTESH NAGAR BRANCH, REP. BY ITS BRANCH ASSISTANT, SHRI RAMESH RUDRAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC. ASSISTANT, R/O. KITTUR RANI CHANNAMMA, URBAN CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI NIYAMIT, BAILHONGAL BRANCH, MAHANTESH NAGAR, BELAGAVI, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI, PIN CODE- 590016. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRASHANT MATHAPATI, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS PENDING ON THE FILE OF VII JMFC, BELAGAVI IN CC NO.839/2017 ORDER DATED 10.12.2019 AND AT THE SAME TIME, CALL FOR THE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.6/2020 PENDING ON THE FILE OF XI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI ORDER DATED 05.04.2022 AND EXAMINES THE LEGALITY AND PROPRIETY OF THE CASE AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY JMFC VII COURT, BELAGAVI, IN CC NO.839/2017 DATED 10.12.2019 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT, CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE XI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI IN CRL.APP.NO.6/2020 DATED 05.04.2022 AND ACQUIT THE REV/PET/ACC. V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.04.25 16:09:29 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6786 CRL.RP No. 100223 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Sum of Rs.35,500/- tendered by the counsel for the revision petitioner to the respondent and the same is acknowledged in the order sheet. 2. A joint memo came to be filed by the revision petitioner, acknowledged by the respondent. Joint memo reads as under: “Herein the memo on behalf of Rev/pet is as under That the Rev/petitioner has deposited the amount as follows 17/02/2020 Rs.19,000/- 12/08/2022 Rs.28,500/- 24/04/2025 Rs.10,000/- Total amount Rs. 57,500/- paid Balance amount Rs. 35,500/-“ - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6786 CRL.RP No. 100223 of 2022 3. Placing the joint memo on record, revision petition stands disposed of. 4. Since, the entire compensation amount is paid, fine amount of Rs.2,000/- ordered by trial Magistrate, confirmed by the First Appellate Court towards the defraying expenses of the State stands set aside. 5. Amount in deposit if any, is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HMB CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 44