Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56015 (BOM)

ARUN S/O NAMDEORAO SOLANKE v. ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA THR. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ANOTHER

CAO/1977/2018 · 2025-03-05

Shri Abhay J Mantri, Shri Avinash G Gharote

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1.cao.1977.2018 in mcast.23267.2018 in wp.7138.2016.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 1977 OF 2018 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 23267 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7138 OF 2016 (D) (Arun Namdeorao Solanke V/s Zilla Parishad, Akola & Anr.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Mr. S. N. Chikhale, Advocate for Applicant. None for the Non-applicants. ------------ CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : MARCH 05, 2025. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 1977 OF 2018 . By the present Application, Applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 1 year and 6 months, in filing the review application. Though notices have been served, none appears for the Non-applicants. 2. Considering the reasons given, the Civil Application is allowed. 3. Office to register the review application. 1.cao.1977.2018 in mcast.23267.2018 in wp.7138.2016.odt MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 23267 OF 2018 . Heard. 2. The learned Counsel for Applicant submits that there is a Government policy, which permits an untrained Teacher of Scheduled Tribe Category to be appointed. The order dated 27/6/2017, passed in Writ Petition No. 7138/2016 (Page 13) does not indicate that this Court was ever addressed on the said policy. 3. We, therefore, do not find this to be a case, where it can be said that there is an error apparent on record in terms of the requirement of Section 114 and Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 4. The Civil Application is, therefore, rejected. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) vijaya