IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 206 RSA-4096-2005 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.05.2025 Babu Ram Gupta ...Appellant Versus Municipal Committee, Shahabad ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for the respondent. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the sole appellant has unfortunately died on 17.09.2007. He further submits that the communication sent on the address of the appellant available with him has not been responded to. He thus submits that despite his best efforts, he has not been able to contact the legal representatives of the appellant and as such, pleads no instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the factum of death of the sole appellant and has placed on record a copy of his death certificate. 3. In view of the above, as there is no one to prosecute the present appeal, the same cannot proceed as such. 4. Dismissed for want of prosecution. (VIKAS SURI) May 06, 2025 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2025.05.06 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment